<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<upm-export>
	<title>Caledon Citizen</title>
	<link>https://caledoncitizen.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon Jun 1 10:01:31 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
	<generator>Universal Post Manager 1.1.2 [ www.ProfProjects.com ] </generator>
	<language></language>
	
			<item>
			<title>We should be “outraged” over Bill 23: Reader</title>
			<link>https://caledoncitizen.com/?p=38122</link>
			<pubDate>Mon Jun 1 10:01:31 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://caledoncitizen.com/?p=38122</guid>
			<content-encoded><![CDATA[<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>OUR READERS WRITE</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>As citizens we should be outraged by the undemocratic nature of some of the proposed changes in Bill 23.&nbsp;</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>It is as if every effort has been made to find and block any avenue a citizen might have to legitimately challenge ill-advised development:</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>1. The Planning Act will no longer require that the public is notified of proposed development.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>2. The public will not have the right to appeal municipal council decisions, only developers may do so.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>3. The Ontario government will have the power to override municipal council decisions, change official plans and impose development.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>4.&nbsp;The Ontario Land Tribunal will have power to order an unsuccessful party (read citizens) to pay a successful party's (read developer) costs. Previously, costs orders were based on egregious or frivolous behaviour, not on the outcome of a decision.&nbsp;</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>5. The Ontario Land Tribunal will have expanded power to dismiss an appeal without a hearing.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>At no point during the June election were Ontario voters told of these plans to disenfranchise them of a say in how their communities and neighbourhoods are to change, and at no time were they debated.&nbsp;</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Now, debate is being curtailed to an extreme extent by the government's intention of rushing through the legislation – at a time when there is a hiatus at the Municipal level, with existing Councils departing and new Councils only just being sworn in. This is profoundly wrong.&nbsp;</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>We should all urge the Ford government to find a better way.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>Larry Flint</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>Inglewood</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->]]></content-encoded>
			<excerpt-encoded><![CDATA[]]></excerpt-encoded>
			<wp-post_id>38122</wp-post_id>
			<wp-post_date>2022-11-24 11:51:47</wp-post_date>
			<wp-post_date_gmt>2022-11-24 16:51:47</wp-post_date_gmt>
				</item>
</upm-export>
